Skip to content

Coercion allegedly used on Rimšēvičs and Tabors to make them provide false testimonies

Riga City Court imposes probation on Ilmārs Rimšēvičs, ex-President of Latvian Central Bank, and Uģis Tabors, businessman, for their involvement in attempting to secure fraudulent testimony, according to the LETA news agency's reports...

Coercion allegedly used against Rimšēvičs and Tabors to produce false statements
Coercion allegedly used against Rimšēvičs and Tabors to produce false statements

Coercion allegedly used on Rimšēvičs and Tabors to make them provide false testimonies

Two individuals, Rimšēvičs and Tabors, have found themselves in the midst of a legal battle after being charged under Section 301 of the Criminal Law for allegedly compelling false testimony, explanations, opinions, and translations.

According to the prosecutor's office, both men are accused of endangering the interests of the jurisdiction through their actions. Rimšēvičs is charged with organising and leading the illegal influencing of a witness, while Tabors is accused of illegally influencing a witness by offering remuneration.

The alleged aim of Tabors' actions was to get the witness to recant previous testimony and provide false, favorable testimony in a criminal case that is already in progress. Similarly, the allegations against Tabors involve promising remuneration to a witness, similar to the charges against Rimšēvičs.

The prosecutor's office has stated that the information obtained in the criminal case and the evidence gathered support the guilt of both accused persons in the commission of the crime. The offence under Section 301 of the Criminal Law is punishable by imprisonment for up to three years, or short-term imprisonment, or probation, or community service, or a fine.

Both defendants deny their guilt. Rimšēvičs was sentenced to five years of probation, while Tabors was sentenced to three years. However, the verdict has not yet entered into force and may be appealed in the Riga Regional Court.

The verdict may not be the end of the matter, as the prosecutor who filed charges against Rimšēvičs and Tabors has not been publicly disclosed. It is important to note that the charges against Tabors were not specified in the paragraph.

In conclusion, this case highlights the seriousness with which the legal system views the manipulation of witnesses and the potential consequences for those found guilty. The case is ongoing and will likely be closely watched as it progresses through the appeals process.

Read also:

Latest