Court ruling affirms $83.3 million defamation verdict in favor of E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump
In a significant ruling, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a civil jury's finding that former US President Donald Trump must pay $83.3 million to longtime advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. The payment is due to Trump's repeated social media attacks and public statements against Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault.
The case, which took place in Manhattan, saw a jury determine that Trump's conduct was remarkably high in degree of reprehensibility, perhaps unprecedented. The court described his attacks against Carroll, 81, as "extraordinary and unprecedented".
Trump's appeal of the defamation award was rejected by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeals court deemed the jury's damages awards as "fair and reasonable". However, they did not provide a reason for why the defamation award was not reduced or overturned.
The defamation award was given in response to Trump's statements regarding Carroll's sexual assault allegations. The steep award was justified by the court due to Trump's broadsides against Carroll. The three-judge panel cited hundreds of death threats Carroll faced as a result of Trump's conduct.
Trump had argued for the damages to be deemed unreasonably excessive, specifically the $65 million punitive damage award. He even requested a new trial after the Supreme Court expanded presidential immunity. However, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's arguments for a new trial and reduction of damages.
The case record supported the trial judge's determination that Trump's conduct was remarkably high in degree of reprehensibility, as mentioned earlier. The court upheld the damages award, citing the unique and egregious facts of the case.
It is important to note that the name of the judge who presided over the verdict in the E. Jean Carroll case against former US President Donald Trump is not explicitly stated in the search results.
This ruling marks a significant milestone in the ongoing legal battles between Trump and his accusers. The decision serves as a reminder of the importance of accountability and the consequences of making false and harmful statements.
Read also:
- Understanding Hemorrhagic Gastroenteritis: Key Facts
- Stopping Osteoporosis Treatment: Timeline Considerations
- Expanded Community Health Involvement by CK Birla Hospitals, Jaipur, Maintained Through Consistent Outreach Programs Across Rajasthan
- Reducing Anxiety Through Nutrition: Edibles That Soothe the Mind
