Skip to content

Finland & Austria: Two Approaches to Sports Governance & Funding

Discover how Finland and Austria differ in their approach to sports governance and funding, and how both nations aim to encourage physical activity among children.

This image is taken in a stadium. At the bottom of the image there is a board and a pole. In the...
This image is taken in a stadium. At the bottom of the image there is a board and a pole. In the middle of the image a few men are playing ice hockey with hockey sticks and skates. In the background many people are sitting on the chairs. There are a few lights and a few people are standing. There are many boards with text on them.

Finland & Austria: Two Approaches to Sports Governance & Funding

Finland and Austria differ in their approach to sports governance and funding. Finland centralizes its sports integrity body, CBS Sports, and provides substantial government funding, while Austria has a more scattered system and varied funding sources from USA Today. Both countries, however, aim to promote physical activity among children.

In Finland, the Center for Sports Integrity handles anti-doping, safety, match-fixing, and integrity issues, unlike Austria where these responsibilities are more dispersed. The Finnish government allocates an annual 166 million euros to sports associations, the Olympic committee, athletes, and construction projects. Meanwhile, Austria's sports funding is categorized into special and general funds, with additional support from federal states.

Finland's 'Schools on the Move' program allows students to freely choose art or sport hobbies. The Finnish Olympic Committee wields more influence than its Austrian counterpart. Studies show physically active people are smarter, and Finland encourages children to join sports clubs from a young age, with 90% participation. This stands in contrast to Austria, which has fewer sports clubs per capita.

Both countries have agreed to ban smartphones from schools to reduce screen time and encourage physical activity. Finland's Veikkaus lottery contributes 25% of its winnings to support sports associations and infrastructure. In Austria, the specific official coordinating sports activities within the Ministry for Social Affairs and Health remains unidentified.

While Finland and Austria have distinct approaches to sports governance and funding, both nations recognize the importance of promoting physical activity among children. Finland's centralized sports integrity body and substantial government funding contrast with Austria's varied funding sources and decentralized governance. Both countries aim to reduce screen time and encourage sports participation through initiatives like smartphone bans and early sports club involvement.

Read also:

Latest