Skip to content

Gear Evaluation: Analyzing the Performance of the Giro Axis Snow Goggles

Comprehensive examination of the Giro Axis snow goggle, presenting insights on its field of view, optical clarity, fit, comfort, robustness, and additional features.

Gear Evaluation: Analyzing the Performances of Giro Axis Snow Goggles
Gear Evaluation: Analyzing the Performances of Giro Axis Snow Goggles

Gear Evaluation: Analyzing the Performance of the Giro Axis Snow Goggles

In the realm of snow goggles, two standout models are the Giro Axis and the Smith I/O. Both offer a medium fit, cylindrical lens shapes, and are priced around the same, making them strong contenders for winter sports enthusiasts.

The Giro Axis, a testament to Giro's leadership in the snow goggle market, comes with two quality Zeiss lenses, both utilizing "Vivid" technology. Its lens-change system is a twist-to-open mechanism, and it boasts an effective EVAK venting system for fog resistance. The Axis also features a triple-layer foam build for comfort, and its frame has shown almost no signs of wear after extensive use.

The Giro Axis provides good all-around views without causing tunnel vision, and its Zeiss lenses offer excellent clarity and definition. The Axis' quick-change system is user-friendly, making it a preferred choice over the Smith Skyline's system. Moreover, the Axis' build quality is durable and strong, and it can fit over a pair of prescription glasses.

Giro also offers a women's-specific version of the Axis called the Ella, which costs the same at $190. The Ella has an identical feature set as the Axis.

On the other hand, the Smith I/O includes two high-quality ChromaPop lenses, class leaders in terms of clarity and definition. Its comfortable three-layer foam build and good overall ventilation make it a strong contender.

While the Smith I/O offers a spherical shape for better maximizing visibility, the difference between it and the Axis' cylindrical shape isn't significant. Swapping lenses is a bit more challenging with the Giro Axis, as it requires pressing down fairly forcefully at the corners of the lens, which can leave smudges.

In terms of durability, the Giro Axis wins out, with a higher-quality and more robust feel. However, Smith's ChromaPop lenses are preferred by some over the Axis' Zeiss lenses, although the difference isn't major.

Another contender in the market is Anon's Sync, which offers a quick-change system that is more user-friendly than the Skyline's. Dragon's NFX2 is another well-made option in this price range, with a lens-change system that is much easier, requiring only a push of a lever on each side of the frame to release the lens.

The Oakley Fall Line XM is an intriguing alternative to the Axis, but it only includes one lens versus the Axis' two.

Ultimately, the choice between the Giro Axis and the Smith I/O comes down to how you prioritize value versus optical quality and styling. Both goggles offer a quick and easy lens-change process without making any major concessions in performance. For those who value an easy-to-use quick-change system, the Giro Axis might be the better overall value. On the other hand, those who prefer Smith's ChromaPop lenses might lean towards the Smith I/O.

In the end, both the Giro Axis and the Smith I/O are excellent choices for snow sports enthusiasts, offering a blend of style, performance, and functionality.

Read also:

Latest