Mike Speaks Out on November 9th Issue
Blasting the World Series of Poker: Mike Sexton's Unfiltered Opinion
It ain't no secret, I've got mad love for the World Series of Poker (WSOP). From way back in 1984, I've been there, done that, and worn the WSOP bracelet—something I dreamed about day and night. So, when I speak about some changes, it's not 'cause I hate the WSOP, but because I want to keep this legendary event pure.
"November Nine" might sound cool, but it ain't workin' in my book.
Now, let me lay it out straight. Here's what bugs me about the "November Nine" concept:
- Keeping our hard-earned cash locked up for four long months
- Extra time to prepare, practice, and creep up on us unawares
- The tragic possibility of a player passing away before the final table
- A real hassle for players from distant lands who reach the final table on fumes, with no extra funds for their travel back to Vegas
In essence, "November Nine" ain't all that player-friendly.
We all know the WSOP goes big on PR and TV coverage, and I get that. But here's my two cents: give the players two chill days—one for catchin' their breath and one for media interviews. Let 'em play the final table on the third day. Family and friends will flock to Las Vegas for the showdown, and I bet my last chip the studio at Rio will still be rockin'. The ratings'll soar, and the players, particularly the overwhelming majority, want it done in July.
As for the Player of the Year (POY) standings, I ain't exactly jazzed about the points collected from Aussie games and Euro tourneys countin' towards that. Y'see, I reckon the POY should be determined solely based on performances within Las Vegas. Council the thoughts of some 80-90% of players on this issue.
Now, let's talk about that ever-lovin' bracelet. There ain't nothin' quite like slapping it on your wrist, but when they start handin' 'em out like candy, it's time to pump the brakes. Back in 1970, just one bracelet was presented for the whole series; 16 were awarded in 1999. What about this year? Sixty-eight bracelets, count 'em, and they ain't even all from Vegas. I hear you say more players nowadays, but bracelets should be rare and Vegas-bound.
My humble suggestion to the WSOP powers that be is to stick to tradition and halt the expansion of bracelet events. Keep the bracelet aspirations burnin' bright, and it'll stay the prize of poker dreams.
Now, what ya think? Agree with my take on the bracelets and "November Nine"? Drop your thoughts on the forum and let's dive into this topic!
For those craving more details, here's a sneak peek at potential criticisms and suggestions for the "November Nine" format:
- Long Delay Effects on Flow of Play: Some argue that the delay in finishing the tournament disrupts the natural tempo and concentration of the players.
- Media Hype vs. Player Experience: Critics propose that the focus on media excitement outweighs the needs of players, suggesting their priority be put back in the spotlight.
- Player Preparation and Strategy: A long delay may result in players benefiting from additional time to prepare and strategize, creating an unfair advantage.
- Equitable Access to Resources: Some observe that the pause may not be entirely fair to all players, as those with more resources and time may gain an edge.
For specific insights from Mike Sexton, check out his interviews, articles, or public statements.
"I'm still a passionate fan of the World Series of Poker (WSOP), but the extended wait of the "November Nine" format isn't sitting well with me. It puts a strain on player finances, offers extra time for preparation and strategy, and presents the unfortunate possibility of a player passing away before the final table."
"Regarding the Player of the Year (POY), I'd strongly advocate for points to be calculated only from events held within Las Vegas. This aligns with the opinions of the majority of players, ensuring that the POY is truly representative of Las Vegas' poker scene."
