Modi's One-on-One Diplomacy Fails to Deliver Results; Time to Address the Shortcomings?
In the realm of international diplomacy, the approach of personalized diplomacy, characterized by physical interaction, displays of affection, grand events, and the production of friendship, is being questioned. This is particularly true in the case of India, where the actions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi since 2014 have been under scrutiny.
The clash at Galwan, an unspecified year that marked a significant impact on the relationship between India and China, has raised concerns about the effectiveness of this diplomatic strategy. The incident, which occurred before Prime Minister Modi's 18 meetings with President Xi Jinping, has reportedly dented the camaraderie promoted by the Prime Minister.
The relationship between India and the United States, under the leadership of President Donald Trump, has also been strained. Trump, described as a selfish bully who looks after his own interests first and foremost, forced Prime Minister Modi to stop buying oil from Tehran in 2020. Trump's actions towards India are not motivated by a desire for recognition for ending India's war with Pakistan, as some might assume.
The problem being discussed is the effectiveness of personalized diplomacy as practiced since 2014. Despite its use by Prime Minister Modi, who coined the term "MILES" (Millennium of Exceptional Synergy) to describe the bilateral ties with China in 2014, the Indian government is currently struggling to find its place in the international community.
The writer of this article, X @aakar_patel, the chair of Amnesty International India, does not provide any new information about the effectiveness of personalized diplomacy. However, they suggest that India's current situation can be corrected if it acknowledges the reasons for its current state.
Despite the criticisms, it's important to note that the effectiveness of personalized diplomacy is separate from whether it works or not. As demonstrated by the example of Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger using it to bring China onside with the United States, personalized diplomacy can be a powerful tool when used effectively.
However, the Indian Prime Minister's skills at personalized diplomacy are being called into question. Reports suggest that he is not good at this approach, which has potentially contributed to the strained relationships India has with both China and the United States.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of personalized diplomacy as a diplomatic strategy is a topic of ongoing debate. While its use by Prime Minister Modi has been questioned, it's clear that India's current international standing is a complex issue that requires a comprehensive approach to address. It remains to be seen whether India will change its course since 2014, as it is difficult to convey that their leader may not always be totally competent.
Read also:
- Tobacco industry's suggested changes on a legislative modification are disregarded by health journalists
- Trump's Policies: Tariffs, AI, Surveillance, and Possible Martial Law
- Uncovering Political Ad Transparency: A Guide to Investigating opponent's Political Advertisements in the Digital Realm
- Elon Musk praises JD Vance's debate performance against Tim Walz
