Pennsylvania's Celebration of Israel's Collaborative Colonizers

Pennsylvania's Celebration of Israel's Collaborative Colonizers

The Flawed Speech of Mahmoud Abbas on Nakba Anniversary

Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority leader, has never shied away from making blunders in his speeches. During his recent address at the UN in New York on the 75th anniversary of the 1948 Nakba, Abbas requested that the US and the UK address their historic responsibilities. But this statement isn't the slam-dunk for decolonization one might expect. Instead, Abbas urged recognition of Palestinian self-determination on the basis of the two-state compromise, failing to confront Israeli colonization and the colonial powers’ complicity.

To further emphasize his betrayal, Abbas declared his confidence that the UN would work tirelessly to right the historical injustices inflicted upon the Palestinian people. But what confidence is he referring to? The total elimination of political rights for refugees seems to have slipped Abbas's mind once again. The Nakba has been twisted and distorted into a continuous series of normalized acts of violence, creating a jarring dissonance between the Palestinian people's lived experience of the Nakba and the UN's skewed versions.

BLOG: The Disfigured Commemoration of Nakba at the UN

Historical injustice? Not exactly. It's a specific form of political violence that comes from supporting a colonial endeavor under the guise of a state on colonized land.

The decision to commemorate the Nakba at the UN, while unprecedented, doesn't guarantee a recognition of the perpetual historical injustice on the Palestinian people. It's worth remembering that the vote wasn't unanimous, that opposition to the commemoration exists within UN member states, and that a symbolic event, significant as it is for memory, can't compensate for the countless ways in which Palestinians have been deprived of their political rights and their land.

Abbas doesn't elaborate on what he means by his confidence in the UN's attempts to address the "historical injustice." Will the UN examine its own complicity, like its role in creating the 1947 Partition Plan, which paved the way for Israeli colonization? Will the UN address the injustice inherent in Resolution 194, which ties the right of return to the Palestinians making peace with the colonizers, their "neighbors" in UN rhetoric? How quickly the UN overlooks the brutal Zionist ethnic cleansing, transforming a settler-colonial population into a neighborhood! Where's the balance between the two? Has Abbas addressed this discrepancy?

How many more contradictions must Palestinians endure, and why should their fate hinge on the political farce that the UN has created from colonialism, to the point that they even refuse to get the facts straight? Once again, on what is Abbas relying for his confidence? If it's symbolism and the political violence the UN sparked through supporting Zionist colonization, then Abbas and the PA are a bigger betrayal of leadership than they've shown so far. The Nakba commemoration has been an eye-opener, for sure.

BLOG: The PA Aids Israeli Colonial Expansion through the Two-State Compromise

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of our website.

Enrichment Data:- Context of Confidence: Abbas' focus has shifted to confronting Hamas and countering Israeli policies rather than detailing UN mechanisms. His confidence in redress likely relates to Arab and multilateral diplomatic channels.- Current Priorities: In his recent April 2025 speech, Abbas emphasized four immediate priorities: halting Israel’s military actions, preventing Palestinian displacement, restoring PA governance in Gaza, and preserving Palestinian claims to statehood amid regional fragmentation.- Historical Injustice: The term "historical injustice" refers to the 1948 displacement of Palestinians and subsequent occupation. Abbas' confidence in UN redress likely stems from relying on the UN's institutional commitment to unresolved frameworks like Resolution 194 on Palestinian refugees' right of return and Resolution 242 on Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories.

1. The author questions whether the UN's commemoration of the Nakba truly signifies a recognition of the persistent historical injustice faced by the Palestinian people.
2. The UN's decision to commemorate the Nakba was not unanimous among member states, indicating opposition to the event.
3. Symbolic events, such as the Nakba commemoration, cannot fully compensate for the ongoing deprivation of political rights and land experienced by Palestinians.
4. Abbas' confidence in the UN's efforts to address historical injustice remains unclear, as he fails to detail specific mechanisms or strategies for redress.
5. The UN's role in creating the 1947 Partition Plan, which contributed to Israeli colonization, should be reexamined.
6. The UN's Resolution 194 tie's the right of return for Palestinians to making peace with the colonizers, which could be problematic.
7. The UN's distortion of the Nakba into normalized acts of violence creates a disjointed picture of the Palestinian people's lived experience.
8. The discourse surrounding the Nakba has become a political farce, with the UN even refusing to acknowledge the facts of Zionist ethnic cleansing.
9. Abbas' confidence in the UN's attempts to rectify historical injustice appears to be rooted in symbolism and political violence engendered through supporting Zionist colonization.
10. If Abbas' confidence is founded on Arab and multilateral diplomatic channels, it raises questions about his commitment to the UN's unresolved frameworks for justice.
11. In his recent speech, Abbas conveyed four immediate priorities: halting Israeli military actions, preventing Palestinian displacement, restoring PA governance in Gaza, and preserving Palestinian claims to statehood amid regional fragmentation.
12. The author criticizes Abbas for focusing on confronting Hamas and countering Israeli policies, rather than outlining specific UN strategies for addressing historical injustice.
13. Palestinians continue to suffer the consequences of the 1948 Nakba and subsequent occupation, making their fate inextricably linked to the UN's handling of colonialism.
14. The UN's role in the 1948 Nakba perpetuated a historical injustice that the commemoration fails to adequately address.
15. The two-state compromise promoted by Abbas is under scrutiny, as it is perceived as aiding Israeli colonial expansion.
16. The author challenges the UN's representations of the Nakba and questions its commitment to truth and justice for the Palestinian people.
17. The PA's stance on the two-state solution has been criticized for failing to confront Israeli colonization and address historical injustice.
18. The UN's support for the 1947 Partition Plan paved the way for Israeli colonization, raising questions about its complicity in the Nakba.
19. The right of return for Palestinians is a key issue in Resolution 194, which ties their return to making peace with the colonizers, creating a contentious dynamic.
20. Israel's military actions against Palestinians, displacement, and governance issues in Gaza remain pressing concerns.
21. The future of Palestinian statehood is uncertain amid regional fragmentation, adding to the complexity of addressing historical injustice.
22. The UN has yet to fully confront its own role in perpetuating historical injustice, particularly in the creation of the 1947 Partition Plan.
23. The glass ceiling preventing Palestinian self-determination remains unbroken, despite Abbas' appeals to the UN for recognition and redress.
24. The UN's skewed versions of the Nakba create confusion and further erode the Palestinian people's political rights and land.
25. The narrative surrounding the Nakba must be reevaluated to accurately represent the Palestinian people's lived experiences and demands for justice.
26. The two-state compromise, advocated by Abbas, has been criticized for not adequately addressing historical injustice and Israeli colonization.
27. Palestinians' future is intertwined with the UN's handling of colonialism, making it crucial that the UN addresses its complicity in the Nakba and takes action to rectify historical injustice.
28. The failure to acknowledge the brutal reality of Zionist ethnic cleansing reveals the UN's willingness to normalize violence and perpetuate injustice.
29. The dichotomy between the two states in the two-state compromise obscures the reality of Israeli colonization and the Palestinian people's struggle for self-determination.
30. The UN must re-examine its commitment to unresolved frameworks like Resolution 194 on Palestinian refugees' right of return and Resolution 242 on Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories.
31. The PA's focus on countering Israeli policies and confronting Hamas detracts from their duty to address the UN's role in perpetuating historical injustice.
32. The distortion of the Nakba into normalized acts of violence further obscures the reality of the Palestinian people's struggle for self-determination and justice.
33. The UN's lack of transparency in its handling of the Nakba and its complicity in Israeli colonization calls into question its institutional legitimacy.
34. The Palestinian people deserve a future free from colonial discrimination, military aggression, and displacement, with the opportunity to exercise self-determination on their own land.
35. The resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and the quest for justice require a profound reevaluation of the UN's role in the creation and perpetuation of historical injustice, alongside a concerted effort to address the root causes of the Nakba and promote peaceful coexistence in the Middle East.

Read also: