Resistance to Development: Munich residents aim to preserve idyllic inner-city yard
In the heart of Munich's Sendling district, a green inner courtyard at Lindenschmitstraße 25 has become a centre of controversy. A proposed development, aimed at constructing three townhouses, has sparked outrage among local residents and politicians.
The development, which includes the planned felling of five trees over a century old, has been met with strong opposition. These trees, including an ash tree, two winter lindens, a small-leaved lime, and an elderberry, boast trunk circumferences ranging from 89 to 207 centimeters.
Previously, a commissioned company refused to fell the trees due to their ecological value. However, a building permit was issued, leading Karl Strohl, architect and co-initiator of LIN25, to question its legality. He calls for a thorough investigation into the matter.
The city has since revoked the special permit for felling before September 30. This decision was likely influenced by the petition started by LIN25, now supported by over 7000 people. The tenant initiative aims to have the city withdraw the building permit altogether.
Local politicians have also joined the opposition. Florentine Schiemenz (ÖDP) emphasised the need for every tree and unsealed area in a densely populated district like Sendling for a good future life. Markus Lutz (SPD), BA chairman, promises to ask the fire department to clarify the fire protection assessment.
The development is criticised for being harmful to nature and the neighbourhood. Moreover, it does not create any affordable housing for medium and low-income individuals, but instead caters to high-end housing for a few. The opposition argues that the urban development is neither sustainable, social, nor future-oriented.
The construction project is now subject to a new professional and legal review by the local building commission. This review will focus on its impact on Munich's climate goals and the "sponge city principle". Additionally, the BA has agreed to involve the lower heritage protection authority, as the realization of the building plans would mean a massive intervention in a heritage-protected property.
Thomas Hinz, spokesman for LIN25, questions the assessments of the fire protection and heritage protection of the front building. The search results do not specify the name of the architect involved in the controversial construction project.
The BA has renewed its rejection of the construction project, adding to the growing pressure on those behind the development to reconsider their plans. The fight to preserve the green heart of Sendling continues, with the hope that common sense and environmental responsibility will prevail.
Read also:
- Understanding Hemorrhagic Gastroenteritis: Key Facts
- Stopping Osteoporosis Treatment: Timeline Considerations
- Tobacco industry's suggested changes on a legislative modification are disregarded by health journalists
- Expanded Community Health Involvement by CK Birla Hospitals, Jaipur, Maintained Through Consistent Outreach Programs Across Rajasthan
