Skip to content

Strategies for Filing Treatment/Diagnostic Patent Claims in India

Navigating the patentability of medical treatments and diagnostic techniques in India: An examination of the relevant laws and case studies to successfully navigate this intricate aspect of patent law.

Methods for securing patents for treatment and diagnostic approaches in India
Methods for securing patents for treatment and diagnostic approaches in India

Strategies for Filing Treatment/Diagnostic Patent Claims in India

In the realm of intellectual property, the patentability of methods of treatment and diagnosis is a contentious issue worldwide. This article provides a brief overview of the patentability status in various countries, with a focus on the United States, India, and Europe.

In the United States, China, and a few other countries, methods for diagnosis and treatment in humans or animals are patentable. However, in the US, diagnostic patents face stringent scrutiny and often must demonstrate technical improvements beyond abstract ideas. Conversely, China grants patents protecting treatment-related innovations, as exemplified by recent patents in cancer therapy.

On the other hand, India, Australia, and New Zealand are among the countries that do not allow such subject matter to be patentable. Section 3(i) of the Patents Act 1970 in India prevents the patentability of any process for the medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic, or diagnostic treatment of humans or animals, or any process to render animals free of disease or to increase their economic value or that of their products.

The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement allows Member states to decide the patentability of diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical methods for human or animal treatment. Article 27 of the TRIPS agreement provides flexibility for countries to make exceptions to patentability, as per their national needs and priorities.

However, the specific processes that are prevented from being patentable under section 3(i) of the Patents Act 1970 in India are not explicitly stated in the given text. Similarly, the three requirements for the bar under section 3(i) to apply in India are not specified.

The impact of the patentability of methods of treatment and diagnosis on healthcare or the economy is a topic for further research and discussion. It is crucial to consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of allowing or restricting patentability in this area to ensure equitable access to healthcare and technological advancements.

Read also:

Latest