Tariffs imposed by Trump largely deemed unlawful by American court
The U.S. Court of Appeals has upheld a lower court's decision, ruling that a portion of the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump were unlawful. The decision, made under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), states that the president does not have the explicit authority to impose tariffs, duties, or the like.
In May, a trade court in New York ruled the U.S. president's tariff policy illegal and blocked most of the tariffs he had imposed. This ruling, which was initially made against the tariffs on steel and aluminum products, affected countries such as India and Brazil. Trump, however, dismissed the ruling, stating that all tariffs remain in effect.
Following the initial ruling, the Trump administration appealed, and the tariffs were temporarily reinstated. The dispute at hand concerns how Trump used the IEEPA for economic purposes to impose tariffs.
If the tariffs are ultimately deemed illegal, companies could seek damages. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent believes suspending the tariffs would put the U.S. in a diplomatically embarrassing and dangerous situation. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned that declaring the tariffs illegal would jeopardize the strategic interests of the U.S. at home and abroad.
Trump warned that lifting the tariffs would be detrimental, potentially causing an "absolute catastrophe" and "destroying" the U.S. economy. He suggested he would appeal to the Supreme Court, which is dominated by conservative justices. Trump described the ruling as "extremely partisan."
The U.S. imposes a 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum products, and Trump imposed tariffs of at least 10 percent on numerous countries in April, including a general tariff rate of 15 percent on goods from the EU, which took effect on August 7.
As the case progresses, the U.S. continues to navigate the complexities of international trade and the use of emergency economic powers. The outcome of the appeal could have significant implications for U.S. trade policy and the global economy.
Read also:
- Tobacco industry's suggested changes on a legislative modification are disregarded by health journalists
- Uncovering Political Ad Transparency: A Guide to Investigating opponent's Political Advertisements in the Digital Realm
- Elon Musk praises JD Vance's debate performance against Tim Walz
- Right-wing Israeli minister supports controversial plan for West Bank settlement expansion
