Skip to content

The Case Against Expanding Data Scientist Staffing

Misalignment of employees in data teams can lead to financial waste and stress. Analyzing the importance of analysts, data engineers, and software engineers in your data team can prevent recruitment mistakes. My professional experience spans across various companies I've worked in and consulted...

The Case Against Expanding Your Data Science Team
The Case Against Expanding Your Data Science Team

The Case Against Expanding Data Scientist Staffing

In the realm of data-driven decision making, two key roles have emerged as crucial: Data Scientists and Data Engineers. Each role brings unique strengths to the table, and understanding their distinct purposes can help organizations make the most of their resources.

Data Engineers are the backbone of any data-centric organisation. They excel in integrating solutions with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD), building tests, and ensuring robust, scalable, and interactive software. Their expertise lies in the engineering aspects of data management, making them indispensable for creating the foundation upon which data-driven insights are built.

On the other hand, Data Analysts are the guardians of information. They ensure that the right insights and information are delivered to the right people at the right time. While their role may not be as technical as that of a Data Engineer, they play a vital part in translating complex data into actionable insights.

The vast majority of organisations would benefit from hiring Data Engineers over Data Scientists, according to recent reports. However, the choice between these two roles depends on the specific needs of the organisation. For some, the skills of Analysts and Data Engineers may be more suitable.

The convergence of various skilled and nuanced job roles into data science has led many organisations to suffer. It's important to consider the core of a role before hiring a Data Scientist, whether it's for research, science, foundational engineering, or business as usual support.

Data Scientists are often great with a loose scope and soft requirements, but struggle with data management and processing when the asks are known. This is where Data Engineers shine, as they are adept at handling the intricacies of data management and processing.

Data Scientists and Statisticians have different roles and serve different purposes. Statisticians are a rarer breed, and their skillset is often what organisations crave. The average Data Scientist salary is approximately 21% higher than the average Statistician, reflecting the demand for Data Scientists in the job market.

However, many hiring managers lack understanding of what a good Data Scientist can contribute or when one is needed. Consequently, Data Scientists are often hired to build basic reports, which is not the best use of their skills and resources. This misallocation of resources can lead to underperformance and frustration.

The term 'Data Engineer' gained popularity around 2014, while 'Data Scientist' was more common before. Despite the growing recognition of Data Engineers, the first Data Engineer hired by an organisation in the year 20X4 remains undocumented in available search results.

In conclusion, understanding the unique strengths and weaknesses of Data Scientists, Data Engineers, and Analysts is key to making informed hiring decisions. Each role plays a critical part in the data-driven decision-making process, and organisations that can effectively leverage these roles will be well-positioned to succeed in the data-driven future.

Read also:

Latest