Trump's imposed tariffs have been deemed unlawful by a US court.
The U.S. Court of International Trade has made a significant decision regarding the legality of President Trump's tariffs. In a ruling that could have far-reaching implications, the court has stated that while the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) grants the President powers in extraordinary situations, it does not explicitly mention tariffs, duties, or taxes.
The decision comes after a dozen U.S. states and a group of small businesses filed a lawsuit in April, arguing that only Congress has the authority to impose taxes and tariffs, not the President. The tariffs in question were imposed in April as part of a trade war, citing a national security emergency without Congressional approval.
In the identified legislative acts, Congress has used clear and precise terms to delegate tariff authority. Opponents of the tariffs argue that they do not address an extraordinary situation but serve as a tool to pressure trading partners.
Despite the expected appeal to the Supreme Court, the U.S. administration has prepared options to impose additional tariffs through other federal agencies. The court's ruling, however, has ordered appellate judges to reconsider the decision to block tariffs for all, not just the parties involved in the lawsuit.
It is important to note that the court's decision does not affect tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The reciprocal tariffs imposed by Donald Trump in April are still in effect until October 14.
Among the plaintiffs in the lawsuit are several states and a group of small businesses. The court's ruling has sparked a debate about the balance of power between the President and Congress in matters of trade policy. As the case proceeds through the legal system, the outcome could shape the future of trade relations for the United States.
Read also:
- Tobacco industry's suggested changes on a legislative modification are disregarded by health journalists
- Uncovering Political Ad Transparency: A Guide to Investigating opponent's Political Advertisements in the Digital Realm
- Elon Musk praises JD Vance's debate performance against Tim Walz
- Right-wing Israeli minister supports controversial plan for West Bank settlement expansion
