Skip to content

Undercover Pact Facilitates Higher Gambling Deposits Using Schufa-G Data

Online gambling avoidance of legal deposit restrictions allegedly made simpler by federal states, causing distress among consumer advocates.

Undercover Pact Facilitates Higher Gambling Deposits Using Schufa-G Data

Bombshell Exposé: Secret Gambling Pact to Evade Deposit Limits

Let's dish the tea on a juicy revelation in the German gaming scene! Recent media reports have unearthed a sneaky agreement between interior ministers and online gambling providers that attempts to bypass the 1,000 euro monthly deposit limit set by the State Treaty on Gaming.

The Nitty-Gritty of the Scandal

In a nutshell, players should prove they can afford higher limits, as mandated by § 6c (1) (3) of the State Treaty on Gaming 2021. But here's the catch—the technicalities are handled via the LUGAS system. Instead of demanding bank statements or income evidence, authorities accept the so-called "Schufa-G information" as sufficient proof. That's right, a general creditworthiness query can get you a higher deposit limit, enough to increase it from 1,000 to a whopping 10,000 euros per month, as shown in the ugly light by the network Investigate Europe with their leak of a controversial document.

Judicial Opinion

Believe it or not, the legal basis for Schufa-G information has already been questioned. In December 2024, the Higher Administrative Court of Saxony-Anhalt ruled that Schufa information is unsuitable as proof of a player's financial capability. The Joint Gaming Authority of the States (GGL) even recommended developing an alternative, but it seems this hasn't made a difference in practice. Schufa-G information, it seems, is still the preferred tool for increasing deposit limits.

The Aftermath

Addiction researchers and consumer advocates, like Burkhard Blienert (Drug and Addiction Commissioner of the Federal Government) and Tobias Hayer (addiction expert from the University of Bremen), have voiced concern. With such loose restrictions, players could find themselves in deep debt, while providers might deliberately accept high losses.

Furthermore, the fact that this regulation has been done in the shadows has angered the public and many politicians. Consumer advocates are demanding income statements or bank statements as a basis for lifting deposit limits rather than the controversial Schufa-G information.

So, What's Next?

Wait and see. As the cat's out of the bag, we'll have to watch as other courts address the Schufa-G issue and witness the GGL's next moves to block credit limit increases based on it.

In the grander scheme, the gambling industry might have to overhaul its financial verification methods and move toward income or bank statement verification. This shift aligns with global trends toward financial transparency and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, making things more complex but hopefully safer for both players and operators.

[1] Tipico's ISO 14001:2015 certification underscores its commitment to compliance and risk management.[2] Stricter financial checks could reduce problem gambling but might also create barriers for legitimate users.[3] The EU emphasizes transactional transparency in digital financial services, as reflected in non-gambling financial tutorials like MKOPA loan checks and PayPay withdrawals.

  1. The controversial agreement between interior ministers and online gambling providers, revealed to evade deposit limits, has raised concerns in the casino-and-gambling industry, with the capability to increase deposit limits from 1,000 to 10,000 euros per month based on Schufa-G information.
  2. Schufa-G information, which is a general creditworthiness query, has been questioned regarding its suitability as proof of a player's financial capability, as evidenced by the Higher Administrative Court of Saxony-Anhalt's ruling in December 2024.
  3. Addiction researchers and consumer advocates, such as Burkhard Blienert and Tobias Hayer, have warned about the potential dangers of loose restrictions and the subsequent risk of problem gambling among players.
  4. In light of this scandal, the public and many politicians are demanding income statements or bank statements as a basis for lifting deposit limits, rather than relying on Schufa-G information.
  5. The gambling trends are indicating a future shift in financial verification methods towards income or bank statement verification, mirroring global trends toward financial transparency and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, although this could create barriers for some legitimate users.
  6. The gambling industry may need to reassess and update its financial controls in response to the exposed pact, aligning itself with growing industry-wide demand for financial transparency and AML compliance.
Online gambling regulatory loopholes, allegedly exploited by federal states, reportedly provide ways to sidestep established deposit limits, sparking outrage among consumer watchdogs.

Read also:

    Latest