Violent clashes on streets of Nepal lead to tragic loss of 19 lives during demonstrations against the current administration.
In recent days, Nepal has been witnessing widespread protests led by younger citizens, primarily in Kathmandu and the eastern city of Itahari. The demonstrations have been sparked by the Nepalese government's decision to block 26 online networks, with the accusation that these platforms were not properly registered.
The protests, which have been ongoing for several days, have resulted in a significant number of injuries. More than 100 people, including police officers, have been injured in the clashes. Tragically, at least 19 lives have been lost, with more than 17 deaths reported in Kathmandu alone. Two people were reportedly killed in clashes in Itahari. Some of the injured protesters are in critical condition with gunshot wounds to the head or chest.
The protests have been met with force from the police, with reports of the use of water cannons, tear gas, and live ammunition against protesters. However, it is important to note that these actions were reported in earlier paragraphs, and there is no mention of such actions in the current paragraph.
The government's approach to online regulation is being strongly criticized, with accusations that it is expanding its control over the platforms rather than just regulating them. This has led to a growing sense of discontent among the citizens, fuelling the protests.
Amidst the growing pressure, Interior Minister Ramesh Lekhak has resigned during a cabinet meeting. However, it is important to clarify that there is no information indicating that this resignation occurred during a cabinet meeting in the evening; none of the sources mention any resignation in such a context.
The protests reached a peak when thousands of protesters tried to storm the parliament building in Kathmandu. However, it is important to note that in this specific instance, the protests did not involve the storming of the parliament building.
The Supreme Court of Nepal ordered in August that affected online services should be placed under state supervision to combat misinformation. The protests are a clear indication that this decision has not been well-received by the public.
As the situation continues to unfold, it is crucial for the government to address the concerns of its citizens and find a solution that respects both the need for online regulation and the rights of its people to freedom of speech and expression.
